Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Join a Debate About the "Shoot to Kill" Slogan

The Director of the Trauma Centre, Vimla Pillay, put out the following press statement on the 15th October about her concerns regarding the "Shoot to Kill" slogan. We would like people to read it and join a discussion on the blog about whether you agree or disagree, or any other comment you would like to make (bearing in mind that hate speech etc. will not pass the moderator). If you don't have a gmail account, when you make a comment, put your name in the box if you want to, and choose 'Anonymous' to send. We would like to hear from all of you - this is an issue that affects every single one of us. If you have been a victim or survivor of criminal violence, we would especially appreciate your comments.



The Trauma Centre for Survivors of Violence and Torture strongly condemns the “Shoot to Kill” slogan. We consider this to be a grossly irresponsible slogan, as it permits Carte Blanche shooting without forcing one to stop, think and restore rational thought under any threatening circumstances.


We also strongly condemn the killing of police officers, as they are appointed as the protectors of the citizens of the country however, this does not dismiss the need for a responsible approach. The need for a humane, logical and strategic approach to address crime and violence is urgent and this is what must be addressed and planned for as a matter of priority. Making irresponsible statements like the “Shoot to Kill” slogan aggravates and escalates the culture of crime and violence.

Mankind inherently seeks justice and freedom and should always take a stand against injustices and the violation of human rights. We as a nation need to help our citizens to hold human life and human dignity in absolute reverence. Violence begets violence we cannot use violent methods to reduce and condemn violence, this sadly results in innocent lives being lost and it intensifies anger and frustration resulting in a sense of helplessness and subsequently to greater desperation. This in turn leads to desperate often irrational and irresponsible means to finding appropriate solutions. All people need to learn how, to momentarily calm down and this simple skill may prevent a number of unnecessary deaths of innocent people. It is imperative that SAPS officials be trained at a trainee level to exercise judgement in action, even in situations that require split second decision making.

The constitution of South Africa and the Bill of Rights respects human rights and should be the fundamental principle underlying all the service provided by the country. Capital punishment was abolished and it is ironic that a decade later, we hear a statement like “Shoot to Kill”. By addressing the problem of crime and violence in South Africa, we need to simultaneously teach each citizen including perpetrators, officials of law and order, and all others, that we respect every individual’s right to life. Victims become perpetrators and this perpetuates the cycles of violence, if we do not stop and evaluate the current crisis and the way forward we will continue to be the crime capital of the world.

A country like South Africa was transformed from a violent and oppressive regime through dialogue, negotiations and patience. Crime and violence too can be appropriately and effectively addressed if there is greater investment in finding the best strategic and well thought out approach. Let us all take responsibility to do this together.




6 comments:

  1. "Violence begets violence", I'm pretty sure there is very little to no evidence backing up this statement.

    In situations where crime is as extreme and as violent as in SA,violent methods are about our only hope.

    Wars are won by the country that does the most damage to the other country and not by the country that tries the peacefull approach.

    Yes, it may be a violation of the Bill of Rights, but surely a criminal should not be afforded these rights.

    ReplyDelete
  2. So is "deadly force" something different from "shoot to kill"? Just wondering because our politicians sometimes use language in very interesting ways.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sadly, but true violence DOES beget violence and the evidence, simply put, is with our children. The shoot to Kill slogan is justifying to our young children if you want anything in life you can use violence to get it no matter what. I believe politicians should think about what they are really saying before they make a statement that could have an impact on your life as well as your child's life. Giving the police that power... “The shoot to kill”... Can have deadly consequences... If you were in the wrong place at the wrong time... Just a little something to think about... Donna Miller

    ReplyDelete
  5. Your article makes a good point and a very valid plea. I'm not so familiar with the slogan but it harks back to the "one settler, one bullet" slogan, born out of a particular context of violence. that we still have apparently desperate slogans that allude to violence (be it self defense or not) is very sad. It suggest that people don't have confidence in alternative means of reacting to a situation. A sign that we have far to walk on the road to peace, justice and freedom.

    Thank you for a fine blog as a forum for discussion on a topic I still hold close to my heart.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dear tanclo
    Thank you for your interest and response. I deeply believe that no one human being has the right to kill any other human being and violence simply cannot be used as a means to end violence in the country.

    "Do we still have to resort to desperate slogans that allude to violence (be it self defence or not)?" I agree with you "that people don't have confidence in alternative means of reacting to a situation. A sign that we have far to walk on the road to peace, justice and freedom." I do not think that people even look for alternate means of addressing critical issues like crime and violence.

    How can people want peace on earth and then find themselves declaring war on violence in order to get rid of war and violence? It does take a longer time and it is a more difficult route to find peaceful ways of addressing violent issues, but we NEED to take the time to do that.

    We do have the solutions however,and the powers that be MUST call for solutions and dialogue around them.
    Vimla Pillay, Director.

    ReplyDelete

Please enter your comment. It won't appear on the blog immediately because we moderate all comments.